Three Issues
Regarding US Aviation and the Global Market
1. Certification
of New Products
In order for a
company to bring a new product to market it must first apply to the FAA for a certification
of the product. This helps to ensure
that the product is safe to use and is a very important step in the implementation
of a new product. However, due to an abundant lack of resources and properly
trained personnel, it is taking the FAA anywhere from one to eighteen months to
approve the certification of new products.
The Government
Accountability Office released a report on the 21st of January 2015 reviewing
initiatives set forth to improve the certification process. The report, “highlighted
the lack of specificity and flexibility in some of the FAA’s bilateral
safety agreements, poor overall communications with foreign civil aviation
authorities and the large fees required by those governments (Mark, para.
3, 2015).” In other words, the FAA certification process is hindering US
manufacturers’ ability to compete in a global market. The negative outcomes
involved with a slow FAA certification process are intensified by the less
time-consuming processes used by the aviation regulatory bodies of other
countries.
2. The
European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
The EU ETS is a plan which attempts to put a cap on the
total amount of carbon-dioxide emitted within EU. Companies are able to trade and
sell emissions allowances, and must have enough of the allowances by the end of
the year to cover their emissions. In 2012 the EU ETS planned to apply these
regulations on emissions to the aviation industry, which included flights
originating outside of the EU. Prior to these regulations coming into effect,
President Obama signed an anti-ETS bill which stated that US airlines could not
participate in the trading scheme. China, Russia, and India soon after passed
similar laws. Due to the international pressure the EU ETS laws regarding
foreign carriers was put on hold until 2013. A year later the laws regarding
international operators was postponed until 2017.
The international business aviation community has been
against the EU ETS laws from the onset. The National Business Aviation
Association (NBAA) referred to the EU ETS as an “onerous and unnecessary tax
that severely harms the industry and limits the economic benefits
it provides” (Klenske, para. 3, 2014). Further impeding the integration
of the EU ETS into the international aviation community is the development of
emissions standards by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
that were accepted by 185 member states.
3. Persian
Gulf Carriers Receive Illegal Government Subsidies Resulting in Unfair Competition
United Airlines, American Airlines, and Delta Airlines
released a groundbreaking report recently claiming that, “Qatar Airways, Etihad
Airways and Emirates have received $42 billion "in quantifiable subsidies
and other unfair benefits from their respective governments since 2004"”
(Karp, para. 2, 2015). This illegal funding has resulted in a distorted
marketplace which has allowed the three Gulf airlines to expand their
businesses under conditions that should be resulting in lost profits.
The actions of the governments of Qatar and the United
Arab Emirates are an immediate and severe threat to the operations of US
carriers. However, Emirates is the leading purchaser of American manufactured
aircraft produced by Boeing. This puts the US government in an awkward
situation of conflicting national and international interests. To Capt. Rick
Dominguez, executive administrator of the Airline Pilots Association
International the way forward is clear and something must be done to provide a
fair competitive playing field for the airlines. In his words, "Nothing
less than our careers are at stake" (Karp, para. 10, 2015).
Bibliography
Bunce, P. (2012, July 18). Hearing: The global
competitiveness of the U.S. aviation industry: Addressing competition issues to
maintain U.S. leadership in the aerospace market. Retrieved March 14, 2015,
from http://www.gama.aero/node/11517
Karp, G. (2015, March 5). U.S. airlines to Gulf
carriers: 'Compete fairly' Retrieved March 14, 2015, from
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/ct-airline-subsidies-0306-biz-20150305-story.html
Klenske, N. (2014, May 20). The latest on the EU ETS.
Retrieved March 14, 2015, from https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2014-05-20/latest-eu-ets
Mark, R. (2015, January 25). GAO reports on FAA
certification and foreign approval of aviation products. Retrieved March 14,
2015, from
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2015-01-25/gao-reports-faa-certification-and-foreign-approval-aviation-products
Supposedly there are supporting evidence corresponding and has details disclosed regarding the Persian Gulf carriers benefitting from subsidies. It has been claimed that Qatar and Abu Dhabi's Etihad wouldn't be financially viable without financial assistance
ReplyDelete