Monday, April 13, 2015

Key Associations for Marine Aviators

Key Associations for Marine Aviators

This week our professor asked us for our final blog to write about two professional associations that would help us down our chosen career paths. As those of you who have been keeping up with my blog this semester know, I am contracted to be a pilot for the United States Marine Corps. With that being said the associations that I have chosen are outside of the norm of what the rest of my fellow Eastern Aviation graduates will choose. The Marine Corps Association and Foundation (MCA&F) and the Order of Daedalians are both prestigious associations that seek to enhance the national defense effort of the United States of America by promoting patriotism and supporting the brave men and women who are actively defending our country today.

It was at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on the 25th of April in 1913 the Marine Corps Association was founded. Then LtCol John A. Lejeune, who would later serve as the 13th Commandant of the Marine Corps, headed a committee of Marines, “MCA&F’s first executive committee” (MCA&F, para. 1). The committee established a vision that continues to drive the association and its initiatives today. As stated by the MCA&F website, their mission is, “To be the preeminent association and foundation for ALL Marines and friends of the Corps dedicated to development and recognition of professional excellence and expanding awareness of the rich traditions, history, and esprit of the United States Marine Corps” (para. 2).

The importance of an organization such as MCA&F cannot be overstated. The MCA&F is an invaluable resource for all Marines who have served and are currently serving, and immeasurably strengthens our Corps as a whole by providing numerous benefits that preserve time honored Marine Corps traditions and values. The benefits of being a member include discounts on important career related essentials such as uniform items and military books, professional development and educational opportunities, financial services through USAA, access to competitive insurance plans, access to the Leatherneck and Marine Corps Gazette archives, and more discounts from companies such as Apple and Dell. The benefits I have listed do not account for all that MCA&F has to offer and I highly encourage all Marines to join this wonderful association.

Unlike MCA&F, I am not a member of the second association I chose. The reason being that I am not eligible. The Order of Daedalians is made up of, “commissioned, warrant and flight officer military pilots and WASPs [Women Airforce Service Pilots]” (Order of Daedalians, para. 1). The name is based off of the Greek myth of Daedalus who constructed wings for himself and his son Icarus in order to escape Crete. The association was founded in 1934 and was created in order to honor and uphold the comradeship of the first pilots to ever fly in the defense of the United States in WWI.

Today the Order of Daedalians serves as an important networking tool for military pilots, while providing many scholarships for aspiring military pilots, and granting awards to those who valiantly serve the United States military. The Exceptional Pilot Award, for example, was presented to Lt. Zaiko of the United States Navy who successfully landed his aircraft despite not having properly functioning landing gear. From the mouth of Lt. Zaiko, “The landing itself was smoother than a lot of landings with gear, and it was a surreal experience when we touched down and coasted along the runway, then stepped out of the plane with both rotors in tact and nothing on fire” (Leslie, para. 3, 2007).

Both organizations I have chosen promote patriotism and seek to serve former and current military members. Both provide invaluable resources and can be used as tools for networking with my peers. It is because of organizations such as these that the traditions and values of the United States military continue to be upheld, while the mission effectiveness of those who currently serve is greatly increased. That is what makes organizations such as MCA&F and the Order of Daedalians important to my career path, and that is what makes these organizations important to the careers and lives of so many other fighting Americans.




References

Daedalians (N.D.) About us. Retrieved from http://www.daedalians.org/about.htm

Daedalians. (N.D.) Scholarships. Retrieved from http://www.daedalians.org/scholarships.htm

Leslie, R. (2007, June 19). VAW-120 pilot receives Order of the Daedalians Exceptional Pilot Award. Retrieved from http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=30107

Marines. (N.D.). About Lt.Gen. John Archer Lejeune (1867-1942). Retrieved from http://www.lejeune.marines.mil/About/AboutLtGenLejeune.aspx

Marine Corps Association and Foundation. (N.D.). About. Retrieved from https://www.mca-marines.org/about


Marine Corps Association and Foundation. (N.D.). Benefits. Retrieved from https://www.mca-marines.org/membership/benefits

Monday, March 30, 2015

The Challenges of Starting an Airline

The Challenges of Starting an Airline

            There is a phrase about the airline industry that goes, “How do you make a small fortune in aviation?  Start with a very large fortune.” The fact is, it is extremely hard to make a profit in the airline industry. Over the past 60 years the airlines have had an average profit margin of less than one percent. Since government deregulation of the airline industry took place in 1978, nearly 200 airlines have sought bankruptcy protection. Some airlines made it through, while others did not. Skybus, an airline that once had its headquarters in Columbus, Ohio, lasted only eleven months after the date of their first flight. When the company closed its doors, they were the third airline to do so that week. A large part of airlines failing has to do with timing and uncontrollable circumstances. For Skybus it was a time when the United States was entering a recession and oil had shot up to over $140 a barrel. For other airlines it amounts to mistakes made in an industry that has little room for error.

            Due to the exorbitant costs in the airline industry, there is very little room for mistakes. A poorly designed business plan can kill an airline before the first flight ever takes place. “Of the nearly 400 air carriers authorized to operate by the U.S. government since 1978, 264 flew then shut down and 62 were approved but never took off. Just 68 are currently flying” (Carey, para. 11, 2014). With little competition between aircraft manufactures, the price of aircraft is very high. According to Boeing’s website the average 737-700 in 2014 cost $78.3. That is one aircraft. The infrastructure that must be put around that aircraft in order to operate and maintain must be thought of as well. Airline pilots and mechanics are specialized jobs which results in many employees with high salaries. Until recently, the cost of fuel was “representing about a third of annual operating cost” (Frank, para. 11, 2015). The cost of fuel, salaries, and aircraft are just a few of the costs an airline must take into account while trying to establish themselves in a volatile market that is shaken on a daily basis by disease, terrorist attacks, and recessions. Proper timing, an extremely large amount of capital, a well-designed business plan, and a lot of luck are required in order to establish an airline startup.

            Despite all of the challenges modern startup airlines face there are some, such as JetBlue and Virgin Airlines, which are successfully able to establish and maintain their operations in the aviation industry. The key to their success has been exploiting niche markets of the aviation industry. JetBlue focuses on customer satisfaction while providing high quality service by offering luxurious amenities and creating a positive work culture among their employees. Virgin airlines also focuses on a higher quality of service while providing low fares. Another facet of the success of airlines has been the matter of timing. Today, “Entrepreneurs see opportunity in the service cuts—a side effect of years of restructuring and consolidation—that have helped the U.S. airline industry attain its highest profit margins since the late 1990s” (Carey, para. 4, 2014). Startup airline People Express for example, is charging a $25 fee for storing luggage in the overhead bins and $1 for a cup of coffee. Also helping startup airlines, as well as the aviation industry as a whole, is the severe drop-off in oil prices.  “Airline CEOs said in recent days that they are focused on reducing debt, upgrading airport facilities, paying dividends to shareholders and profit-sharing with employees” (Frank, para. 6, 2015).

            The airline industry can be unexpected and volatile, yet it always seems to lure entrepreneurs in who believe that their plan will be the one that gets the winning formula right. Some, such as Virgin Air, have the money to burn while waiting to turn a profit. It took losing $600 million dollars before Virgin earned its first profit. Other airlines are canned before ever having an inaugural flight. “"It's a high-profile, sexy business," says Henry Harteveldt of Atmosphere Research Group, a travel research firm. "And if you keep a lid on costs, have the right strategy, aircraft and managers, you can make money”” (Carey, para. 21, 2014).



References
Boeing. (2015). Commercial airlines. Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/prices/
Carey, S. (2014, July 23). New startup airlines crowd the skies. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/new-startup-airlines-crowd-the-skies-1406143697
Frank, T. (2015, January 27). Airline profits soar yet no relief for passengers. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/01/27/airline-profits-soar-passengers-fuel/22395509/
Freed, J & Mayerowitz, S. (2011, December 2). Why's it so hard to make money running an airline? Retrieved from http://cnsnews.com/news/article/whys-it-so-hard-make-money-running-airline
MarketWatch. (2015, March 25). JetBlue named top 25 place to work in Forbes 'America's Best Employers 2015' list. Retrieved from http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jetblue-named-top-25-place-to-work-in-forbes-americas-best-employers-2015-list-2015-03-25-15173349

10tv. (2009, December 6). SkyBus CEO speaks on why airline failed. Retrieved from http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2009/12/04/story-columbus-skybus-ceo-talks.html

Saturday, March 14, 2015

Three Issues Regarding US Aviation and the Global Market

Three Issues Regarding US Aviation and the Global Market

1.      Certification of New Products

In order for a company to bring a new product to market it must first apply to the FAA for a certification of the product.  This helps to ensure that the product is safe to use and is a very important step in the implementation of a new product. However, due to an abundant lack of resources and properly trained personnel, it is taking the FAA anywhere from one to eighteen months to approve the certification of new products.

The Government Accountability Office released a report on the 21st of January 2015 reviewing initiatives set forth to improve the certification process. The report, “highlighted the lack of specificity and flexibility in some of the FAA’s bilateral safety agreements, poor overall communications with foreign civil aviation authorities and the large fees required by those governments (Mark, para. 3, 2015).” In other words, the FAA certification process is hindering US manufacturers’ ability to compete in a global market. The negative outcomes involved with a slow FAA certification process are intensified by the less time-consuming processes used by the aviation regulatory bodies of other countries.

2.      The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)

The EU ETS is a plan which attempts to put a cap on the total amount of carbon-dioxide emitted within EU. Companies are able to trade and sell emissions allowances, and must have enough of the allowances by the end of the year to cover their emissions. In 2012 the EU ETS planned to apply these regulations on emissions to the aviation industry, which included flights originating outside of the EU. Prior to these regulations coming into effect, President Obama signed an anti-ETS bill which stated that US airlines could not participate in the trading scheme. China, Russia, and India soon after passed similar laws. Due to the international pressure the EU ETS laws regarding foreign carriers was put on hold until 2013. A year later the laws regarding international operators was postponed until 2017.

The international business aviation community has been against the EU ETS laws from the onset. The National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) referred to the EU ETS as an “onerous and unnecessary tax that severely harms the industry and limits the economic benefits it provides” (Klenske, para. 3, 2014). Further impeding the integration of the EU ETS into the international aviation community is the development of emissions standards by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) that were accepted by 185 member states.

3.      Persian Gulf Carriers Receive Illegal Government Subsidies Resulting in Unfair Competition

United Airlines, American Airlines, and Delta Airlines released a groundbreaking report recently claiming that, “Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates have received $42 billion "in quantifiable subsidies and other unfair benefits from their respective governments since 2004"” (Karp, para. 2, 2015). This illegal funding has resulted in a distorted marketplace which has allowed the three Gulf airlines to expand their businesses under conditions that should be resulting in lost profits.

The actions of the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are an immediate and severe threat to the operations of US carriers. However, Emirates is the leading purchaser of American manufactured aircraft produced by Boeing. This puts the US government in an awkward situation of conflicting national and international interests. To Capt. Rick Dominguez, executive administrator of the Airline Pilots Association International the way forward is clear and something must be done to provide a fair competitive playing field for the airlines. In his words, "Nothing less than our careers are at stake" (Karp, para. 10, 2015).


Bibliography

Bunce, P. (2012, July 18). Hearing: The global competitiveness of the U.S. aviation industry: Addressing competition issues to maintain U.S. leadership in the aerospace market. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.gama.aero/node/11517

Karp, G. (2015, March 5). U.S. airlines to Gulf carriers: 'Compete fairly' Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/ct-airline-subsidies-0306-biz-20150305-story.html

Klenske, N. (2014, May 20). The latest on the EU ETS. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2014-05-20/latest-eu-ets


Mark, R. (2015, January 25). GAO reports on FAA certification and foreign approval of aviation products. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2015-01-25/gao-reports-faa-certification-and-foreign-approval-aviation-products

UAVs

UAVs in the United States and Abroad

The use of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), also known as drones, has greatly increased in the United States and abroad. UAVs are used in a variety of ways by the United States military, a growing number of civilian operations, and by hobbyists across the country. In proportion to the rising popularity of UAVs, the regulation of UAVs in the United States has been a growing concern among legislators and those involved in the industry. While there are many advantages that come with the use of UAVs, there are also many potential problems such as privacy concerns and public safety that must be dealt with.

 Machines that once seemed more fitting in a science fiction novel are becoming more of a reality every day. Currently there are 38 civil operations that employ the use of UAVs. After obtaining an exemption from the FAA, these 38 civil operations are now able to conduct daily tasks with the UAVs. Recently, Low Country Corp. was granted an exemption to use UAVs in order to, “take high definition images of towers and structures for inspection. These inspections previously required dangerous manual efforts that often required a helicopter to lift the inspector to the top of the focus structure” (AUVSI, para. 3). In another example, State Farm is, “using aerial imagery and analytics in underwriting, reunderwiting, catastrophe response, roof inspection and claim resolution settings” (AUVSI para. 4).

I believe it goes without saying that the average American has no problem with drones being used by companies in situations that are dangerous for humans. Likewise if drones can be beneficial to a company in a way that is non-intrusive to the public I believe most Americans would be fine with that. The issue that comes into play is regulation of UAVs, which deals with an array of issues such as protection of privacy and protection of airspace. Recently, the FAA released a new set of regulations regarding UAVs that benefited those in the UAV industry. However, the FAA implemented major limits as well such as, “no flying at night, or outside the operator’s line of sight, or above 500 feet” (Thompson, para. 1). The proposed regulations would not take affect for another two years. Currently, the regulations are going through a 60 day period in which the public may comment on the proposed regulations. Some companies are choosing to operate despite the lack of regulations, which have been slow in coming out, or are waiting for their special exemption from the FAA. Until the proposed regulations come in to affect, the commercial operation of UAVs remains illegal. For those interested in what a civilian UAV job may entail, follow this link, https://sjobs.brassring.com/TGWEbHost/jobdetails.aspx?jobId=356631&PartnerId=25539&SiteId=5313&codes=IIND ,  to see the duties of a sensor operator on a UAV team.

What is not illegal, but that which has come under strict scrutiny of late, is the use of UAVs by the military. UAVs have greatly altered the strategy and tactics that we use to fight terrorism. We are now capable of monitoring a target for days before deciding to initiate a drone strike to take them out with a precision that we have never before seen. The jury is still out on whether or not drone warfare is effective in countering terrorism, but they have proven to be very cost effective.

The cost of one MQ-9 Reaper drone is $6.4 million, according to an analysis by the American Security Project. The cost of one A-10 Thunderbolt, the plane with capabilities similar to the Reaper, is $18.2 million, adjusted for inflation. Maintenance costs for drones are also lower, as they require less mechanical expertise to fix (Francis, para.7).

With the increase in military and civil use, UAVs are slowly integrating into the national airspace. As more and more commercial operations receive exemptions from the FAA, it is plain to see. Don’t be surprised to see in increase in the coming years of UAVs in your immediate area. By that time they could be doing anything from bringing you groceries to taking your dog for a walk. As they say, the sky is the limit.
           



Bibliography
AUVSI. (2015, February 26). New commercial UAS exemptions include utility and tower Inspections. Retrieved March 2, 2015, from http://www.auvsi.org/blogs/auvsi-news/2015/02/26/exemptions37
FAA. (2015, February 9). Civil Operations (Non-Governmental). Retrieved March 2, 2015, from https://www.faa.gov/uas/civil_operations/
Francis. (2013, February 1). Death by drones: Are they worth the cost? Retrieved March 2, 2015, from http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2013/02/07/Death-by-Drones-Are-They-Worth-the-Cost

Picchi, A. (2015, February 16). FAA drone rules: 5 ways they will transform business. Retrieved March 2, 2015, from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/6-ways-drones-will-transform-business/

Sunday, February 15, 2015

An Overview of Corporate Aviation: Can it Save Your Company Money?

            If you are from Michigan you will remember well the bailout of the Big Three. You also may recall a headline news story that blasted the Big Three executives for arriving at Washington D.C. in private jets to ask for bailout money. Politicians seized the moment to lash out at the executives in order to show they were fighting for the average Joe whose tax money was going to be bailing out these hot shot high rollers. How dare they fly luxury jets and ask for money from hurting Americans! And for the most part the average Joe read the headline and listened to the politicians and scoffed at what he believed was blatant disrespect of and disregard for the working class. What the politicians and headlines did not tell Joe was that corporate aviation fleets are very practical and save time and money, all the while providing a competitive edge in a global industry.
            It is true that the face value cost of commercial flying is typically less than that of hiring a corporate jet or running a corporate fleet. However, what businesses can gain by using a corporate jet is invaluable. Time is money in business. Using a corporate jet greatly reduces time spent waiting at an airport where one has to worry about luggage and security lines. This is just one advantage of many that comes with flying corporate jets over commercial. The following is a list of benefits put together K.C. Dermody of the Sherpa Report:
  • ·     The loss of time is a major issue on commercial flights. From the long lines, potential layovers and the often longer trip to the airport as well as having to check in early. This can easily add up to losing hours upon hours of time that could have been spent more productively. In addition, security delays can not only be a huge hassle, they can cost more time as well.
  • ·      Passengers have to find a flight that fits in with their schedule or can be forced to alter their calendar to fit in with the airlines.
  • ·      With crowded seating, there is little space to conduct business and even less privacy. If you had hoped to conduct a meeting or negotiate a deal in private, other passengers and crew are likely to overhear those conversation s.
  • ·      Commercial airlines offer little in the way of amenities. Today, food and beverages options rarely include much more than a drink and a bag of pretzels. First class is better, but you still get what you get.
  • ·      The risk of lost luggage with passengers separated from their bags is another issue when flying commercially.
  • ·      You'll avoid the inconvenience of the liquid bans that come with flying commercially.
  • ·      You can travel with special belongings, business samples, sports gear, instruments or even bring you pet into the cabin if you so choose.
  • ·      You'll not only have more time to conduct business, you'll have more time to spend with your family and friends by reducing the hours you spend traveling.
  • ·      Flying on a private jet projects an image of success. You'll be seen as an individual or organization that is well-run, efficient and can afford to fly privately (para. 5-10, 2013).

This lengthy list does not include all of the benefits provided by corporate jets, but I believe it is clear to see why they are invaluable to the success of an organization.
       Walmart is a great example of a large successful organization that enjoys massive benefits from an organization run aviation department. From pilots to aviation safety managers Walmart has it all, including a fleet of 20 corporate jets based out of Rogers, Arkansas. To give you an example of what a corporate aviation job may entail I have listed the job requirements from an open position in Walmart’s aviation department. They are as follows:
Position Type
Salary
Shift
0
Position Description
·         Acts a liaison for other country aviation department Safety Management Systems Programs
·         Demonstrates up-to-date expertise in aviation safety and applies this to the development, execution, and improvement of action plans
·         Establishes safety and security objectives
·         Manages the development and maintenance of safety awareness program
·         Models compliance with company policies and procedures and supports company mission, values, and standards of ethics and integrity
·         Provides and supports the implementation of business solutions
·         Serves as an advisor and consultant on aviation safety and security


Minimum Qualifications
·         10 years operations experience in safety risk management as a Flight Deck Crew Member, Aviation Manager, or related field.


Job Role
Manager Safety-Aviation
Location
ROGERS

As a management student myself, hiring in as a safety manager would be a great job were I to choose a career outside of commercial aviation. This is just one job of many that corporate aviation offers. Corporate aviation provides the same types of careers that commercial may provide, albeit the number of jobs available is smaller.
      In summary, corporate aviation is a growing business that is invaluable to the success of an organization. For those of us in the aviation industry it provides many opportunities if a commercial job is not what you are looking for.







Bibliography
Donnelly, B. (2013, May 13). Comparing private jets to commercial airlines. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.sherpareport.com/aircraft/aircraft-overview/comparing-private-jets-commercial-airlines.html
Levin, A., Litvan, L., Dudley, R. (2013, August 14). Wal-Mart air fleet gets taxpayer support for controllers. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-14/wal-mart-fleet-gets-taxpayer-support-to-pay-controllers
Levs, J. (2008, November 19). Big three auto CEOs flew private jets to ask for taxpayer money. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/11/19/autos.ceo.jets/

Walmart. (n.d.). Manager safety aviation jobs in rogers at Walmart. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://jobs.walmart.com/rogers/aviation--travel/jobid5502986-manager-safety-aviation-jobs

Sunday, February 8, 2015

The National Transportation Safety Board’s Most Wanted List: Improving Safety in Aviation

The National Transportation Safety Board’s Most Wanted List: Improving Safety in Aviation
            It is safer to fly today than at any other point in history.  A great deal of the increase in safety is a result of changing the ideology surrounding aviation safety. In a broad sense, the aviation industry has gone from a reactive approach to accidents that looks to single out lone causes, and transitioned into a culture that is proactive that analyzes the entire system in order to prevent future accidents.
            The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), in keeping with the proactive approach to preventing accidents, has created a most wanted list that singles out problematic areas in different modes of transportation. The link to this list is: http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Pages/default.aspx. The two areas that I will be focusing on are “Prevent Loss of Control In Flight In General Aviation and Strengthen Procedural Compliance” (NTSB).
            There is indeed a problem with the loss of control in flight in general aviation, the first issue I will touch on. In fact, according to a fact sheet released by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), loss of control in flight was found to be the number one cause of fatal accidents in general aviation between the years 2001 and 2011 (FAA, para. 32). This statistic is even more unsettling considering that the rates of fatal accidents over the last decade in general aviation, “have remained relatively static” (FAA, para. 31).
            In my opinion the leading factor in these accidents is a lack of proficiency due to either a lack of, or improper, training. Because of the recent economic downturn less pilots are taking to the skies. This has also led to a lack of pilot proficiency resulting from the lack of flight time that pilots are registering. More and more pilots have found it difficult to keep up with rising costs in fuel and parts, consequently keeping them out of the cockpit. In the NTSB report on loss of control in general aviation it was pointed out that, “GA pilot proficiency requirements are much less rigorous than those of airline pilots. GA pilots are much more likely to have longer intervals between training sessions and longer intervals between flights” (para. 3).
            Further complicating matters is poor initial training methods. Rich Stowell, the first to be designated a Master Aerobatic Instructor, had this to say about training for loss of control in flights:
Take the typical stall training conducted to satisfy the FAA's Practical Test Standards, for instance. The emphasis is placed on detailed procedures used to configure for, perform and exit a couple of specific types of stalls. Treated as an independent maneuver unto itself, the whole ordeal is often enveloped in unnecessary melodrama as well. The actual lessons learned, however, are fear and a false association between the stall and slow airspeed.
Consequently, the student granted private pilot privileges might then adopt what seems to be a perfectly reasonable strategy: fly a little faster to have greater margin against those scary stalls. More instances of flat-spotted or blown tires and burned-up brakes result during landing, as do cases where airplanes overrun seemingly short runways. Yet the blame is pinned on the educationally deprived pilot's improper airspeed control and poor judgment. And rather than dealing with the underlying problem, some flight schools simply prohibit pilots from taking their high-performance rental airplanes to airports with runways shorter than 5000 feet (para. 7-8).
            The recommendations that the NTSB has put forth to combat this issue call for pilots to increase their individual efforts to stay proficient, know the limitations of their aircraft, and maintain training. These recommendations are common sense initiatives that every pilot should be doing on their own. The NTSB fails to attack the root causes of the issue, focusing on the pilot instead of looking at the systemic problems, i.e. improper initial training. Based on the research I have conducted I believe the NTSB needs to perform a broad review of training techniques and, based on their results, implement a nationwide program that seeks to correct improper training techniques. Additionally, The FAA should require higher standards of performance from general aviation pilots by revising the current testing standards pilots must pass in order to retain their certification.
            Of greater risk to the public is the issue of procedural non-compliance among commercial aviation. A study done by Boeing from 1982-1991 found that, “claimed that flight crew adherence to procedures could have prevented more than 50 percent of the 232 fatal hull losses” (Aviation Today, para. 5). Keep in mind that this number does not take into consideration nonfatal accidents.
            The cause of these breakdown in procedures is psychological, and differs from system to system. In an article done by Aviation Today, several theories are given as to why people break procedures:
Actually, there are a number of psychological factors hard-wired into humans that can predispose employees to PiNC. The Modified Situation Control Theory 7 indicates that given a reasonable benefit and reasonable chance that no one may detect the violation and the violator would not suffer adversely from their peer group — there is a far greater than even chance the person would violate. The debatable Risk Homeostasis Theory 8 as well as established social psychological thinking indicates that people are natural risk optimizers and generally tend to overestimate their abilities and to underestimate levels of risk (para. 21).
Although the cause of the non-compliance of procedures is situationally dependent and due to varying psychological factors, there is a way to prevent breakdowns in procedure.
            The NTSB has called for an increase in training for abnormal situations, along with the revision and exclusion of several standing procedures. The proposed changes by the NTSB would most assuredly have a positive impact on the industry as a whole, however I would take it a step further. Organizations within the aviation industry need to constantly review and revise procedures in order to eliminate unnecessary steps and add new ones which could lead to higher safety levels. In order to establish such an evolving system managers will need to be provided with continuous feedback from employees about where they see issues with procedural non-compliance, as well as how the employees feel the procedures can be improved. This is a proactive approach that can be used to enhance systems safety in any organization.
            In summary, the most wanted list put forth by the NTSB takes a positive proactive step towards increasing safety in general and commercial aviation. With that being said, the NTSB does not dig deep enough into the root causes of the issues they have focused upon. If there are changes to be made they must be on an industry level, accomplished through training and education of safe practices. Stephen Pope of Flying Mag gives us the bottom line saying, “U.S. airline operations were fatality free in 2011 and 2012, while on-demand Part 135 operations showed safety improvements across the board. That left general aviation as the lone segment where initiatives aimed at improving safety appear to be having little effect.”




Bibliography
Aviation Today. (2007, February 1). Aftermarket: Why good employees violate procedures — Is it inevitable. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.aviationtoday.com/am/categories/maintenance/Aftermarket-Why-Good-Employees-Violate-Procedures-Is-it-Inevitable_8188.html#.VNe8Y53F8TU
Federal Aviation Administration. (2014, July 30). Fact sheet – General aviation safety. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=16774
National Transportation Safety Board. (2015). Strengthen procedural compliance. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Pages/mwl10_2015.aspx
National Transportation Safety Board. (2015). Prevent loss of control in flight in general aviation. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/mwl/Pages/mwl7_2015.aspx
Pope, S. (2013, August 8). Why can't general aviation move the safety needle? Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.flyingmag.com/technique/accidents/why-cant-general-aviation-move-safety-needle

Stowell, R. (n.d.). The problem with flight training. Retrieved February 8, 2015, from http://www.aviationsafetymagazine.com/airplane/Flight-Training-Mistakes.html

Sunday, January 25, 2015

Flying Cheap - The Regional Airlines

           In our most recent class meeting my fellow students and I were shown Flying Cheap, a Frontline documentary done by PBS. The documentary focuses on the crash of Colgan Air flight 3407 in Clarence Center, New York on February 12 of 2009. For those interested here is a link to the documentary: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/flyingcheap/ . In summary, the documentary goes on to analyze the crash and uses it as an example to make a case against poor safety standards used in the regional airline industry, pilot fatigue among them. In this post I will address the state of the regional airline industry today including analysis of the looming pilot shortage and how new regulations have affected the industry. Additionally, using examples from the PBS documentary, I will address professionalism and how professionalism may be demonstrated differently based on factors such as pay and benefits.
In order to understand the accident and video, along with the other topics of discussion, one must understand what constitutes a regional carrier. The regional airline industry, as defined by avjobs.com, consists of “airlines whose service, for the most part, is limited to a single region of the country, transporting travelers between the major cities of their region and smaller, surrounding communities” (para. 7). Further breaking down the regional airline industry there are three sub-groups: large, medium, and small carriers. Large carriers generally have operating revenues of $20 to $100 million with aircraft that seat 60 or more passengers. Medium carriers operate the same type of aircraft but on a smaller scale of operations. Medium carriers tend to generate $20 million or less in operating revenue. Small regional carriers do not have a distinct margin for revenues. Rather they are characterized by the type of aircraft they fly which have no more than 61 seats. (Avjobs, para. 7-10)
The carriers that most people are familiar with are the majors. These carriers include US Airways and Delta, and account for airlines generating more than $1 billion in operating revenue. Most passengers believe that they are always flying with one of the major carriers that they purchased their tickets for. However, this is not always so. Major carriers and regional carriers have established what is called a code share. 
Code sharing is a commercial agreement between two airlines that allows an airline to put its two-letter identification code on the flights of another airline as they appear in computerized reservations systems. For example, Delta Airlines might have an agreement to operate flights for United Airlines on a route. This flight would be listed under United’s identification code (UA) but actually operated by Delta Airlines.  (GSA, 2012, para. 1)
                David Koenig (2014) writing for USA Today puts it simply, saying, “This arrangement helps the big airlines pack their planes more cheaply and contributes to recent record profits” (para. 2). Regional airlines transport passengers between large-hub and medium- or small-hub airports on smaller aircraft and generate a small amount of revenue, while the major carriers can focus on large scale operations generating massive amounts of revenue flying solely from large-hub airports to other large-hub airports.
                Now that a picture has been painted let’s begin with the state of the regional airline industry today and the implications of a possible pilot shortage. There are two opinions on the topic of a pilot shortage in the airline industry. One opinion is that there is not a pilot shortage, and that if pilot pay among the regional airlines was raised the problem would be solved. The second opinion is that there is indeed going to be a pilot shortage due to new regulations and an aging workforce, and that we are already seeing the effects. I hold that the truth lies somewhere in the middle and that neither opinion is entirely right or wrong.
                The regional airlines today are in fact having a hard time hiring qualified pilots for their operations, and it is clear to see that wages and benefits are a principle reason for this. An article in Air Line Pilot, written by the ALPA Staff (2014), cites the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in comparing the wages of newly hired first-officers in the regional airlines and the major airlines:
• 11 of the 12 regional airlines interviewed by the GAO have been unable to meet hiring targets for training classes formed since early 2013. Regional airlines currently pay, on average, about $24 per flight hour (approximately $24,000 annually) for new-hire first officers.
• the mainline airlines interviewed by the GAO report that they are not experiencing any difficulty in attracting qualified and desirable pilot candidates. These airlines currently pay, on average, about $48 per flight hour (approximately $48,000 annually) for new-hire first officers. (p. 21)
                Additionally, in 2012 it was found that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certificated 6,396 air transport pilots. The GAO estimated that in the next ten years only 1,900 to 4,500 new pilots would need to be hired annually. As you can see, the number of new pilots for 2012 is much greater than the highest estimate of the number of pilots required over a year in the next decade, and the number of new pilots certificated each year is growing (ALPA Staff, 2014, p. 20). To further substantiate this claim I present that there are thousands of U.S. pilots opting to take jobs with foreign companies overseas who are offering much higher wages and better benefits.
                So why don’t the regional airlines simply increase pilot pay? The issue here relates to what I detailed earlier about the relationship between the regional and major air carriers. The regionals contracts with the major carriers give control of the ticket prices to the major carriers. When the regional carriers absorb unforeseen costs, such as rising fuel prices, they are unable to pass the cost on to the customer. Therefore, the most effective way to control and mitigate costs is through the wages of their workforce.
                Further complicating the hiring process are new regulations promulgated by the FAA and Congress as a result of the Colgan crash in 2009. The most controversial of these new regulations being a standard set in place stating that all pilots and co-pilots must have at least 1500 hours of flight experience. It is my opinion that this regulation will reduce the amount of pilots coming into the industry. The cost of education and flight lessons are continually rising. This new 1500 hour standard significantly increases that cost. I believe the cost of education along with the low starting pay of new pilots will turn potential pilot candidates away from the industry in search of better conditions, thus making the regional airline hiring process even more arduous than before.
                So what can aspiring pilots and the regional airlines do in order to mitigate the effects of the rising cost and new regulations? For the regional airlines I believe it comes down to a matter of their contracts with the major carriers. The regional airlines need to assume control of ticket prices in order to alleviate the pressures of rising costs in other aspects of their business. This will allow the regional airlines to increase pilot pay. Another option is for the airlines, whether they be regional or major, to establish programs that pay for the flight hours of aspiring pilots. With that being said, aspiring pilots need to take advantage of these programs that I have proposed. Another route, and the route I am taking, is to serve your country and fly for one of the armed forces.
                There is much to be considered with how the regional airlines do business. The aviation industry is constantly evolving, and it will be interesting to see how this looming pilot shortage will be dealt with. At this time I am going to answer questions assigned to me by my class instructor pertaining to the regional carriers and the documentary I mentioned at the beginning of the blog, Flying Cheap. Question number one:
                The Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) represents most regional pilots. Which organization represents the remainder of the industry, such as management, manufacturers, etc.?
                The remainder of the regional carrier industry is represented by the Regional Airline Association (RAA).
                One of the events that led to the Colgan accident was a lack of professionalism. Define professionalism in your own words.
                Professionalism is an unwavering commitment to a moral code and the procedures set forth by a specific profession.
                List two ways in which a lack of professionalism was demonstrated in the documentary.
1.       A failure in oversight by the FAA. The FAA employee charged with overseeing Valujet, the regional carrier that was contracted by Colgan, did not investigate claims of malpractice against Valujet because the owner of Valujet had friendly ties with the FAA employee.
2.       The breaking of the sterile cockpit rule by the pilots. The pilots carried on numerous conversations during critical phases of the flight that did not pertain to the piloting of the aircraft.
Do you feel that first year pilot pay and/or the compensation structure of a regional airline is a contributing factor in the lack of professionalism demonstrated in the documentary?
No. Professionalism is a characteristic developed personally and on an organizational level. It must be talked about, practiced, and refined by the individual and the organization as a whole. I do not believe pay is a factor.
List two specific ways you plan to maintain and expand your level of professionalism once you are employed.
1.       Self -analyze. By continuously analyzing my strengths and weaknesses I will be able to perform my duties to the utmost of my abilities.
2.       Accountability. By holding myself accountable for my mistakes I am able to improve in the areas where I have underperformed.
That wraps it up for this week’s post. A sincere thank you for those of you who stuck it out to the end. Hopefully you learned a thing or two. If you have any questions leave me a comment and I will answer it to the best of my ability.



Bibliography
ALPA Staff. (2014, April 1). A pilot shortage? Nope.It’s all about the money. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from http://www.alpa.org/portals/alpa/magazine/2014/April2014_PilotShortage.pdf
Avjobs. (n.d.). Structure of the Airline Industry. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.avjobs.com/history/structure-of-the-airline-industry.asp
Carey, S & Nicas, J. (2014, February 3). Airline-pilot shortage arrives ahead of schedule. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579361320202756500
Federal Aviation Administration. (2014, October 21). Airport Categories. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_allcargo_stats/categories/
Frontline [Motion picture]. (2010). WGBH Educational Founation.
Sumwalt, R. (2010, February 12). The anatomy of an accident: Colgan Air flight 3407. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.ntsb.gov/news/speeches/RSumwalt/Documents/SCAA-100212.pdf     
Tumulty, B. (2014, February 11). 5 years after N.Y. crash, some airline safety progress. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/11/colgan-air-crash-prompts-safety-regulations/5372353/
United States General Services Administration. (2014, December 5). Code share fact sheet. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103887

Writer, D. (2014, September 11). Fortunes sour for regional airlines as majors prosper. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from http://www.usatoday.com/story/todayinthesky/2014/09/11/fortunes-sour-for-regional-airlines-as-majors-prosper/15437841/